LEGO Architecture
Posted by Vanderdecken12 | Jul 7, 2009 Labels: lego
I know this doesn't have to do with MLN, however, we are attempting to branch off into ALL of LEGO.com, so you can be sure to keep up to date with the entire site here.
There is a new LEGO Product: Architecture. It will contain historically significant architectural buildings, such as the already included Seatle Space Needle and the Empire State Building. Here is the link, and thank you, RocketPenguin, for finding this information. You will get 15 clicks for your efforts.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
bionicle.com has been updated with the legends.
This new Architectural LEGO looks really cool. My favorite one is the Seatle Space Needle. They should make a Disney World model, of Cinderella's Castle. That would be awesome.
EragonSaphira
Agreed! They actually have for purchase at Disneyland a set of "LEGO" models of Disneyland structures, but they're small and they're not actually LEGO.
That's awesome. A shame that they aren't LEGO though. I've never been to Disneyland or Disney World.
On the size; the Architecture, models are fairly small themselves, so small Disneyland castles wouldn't be that bad. As my English teacher tells me almost daily, "It's quality not quantity". So as long as they look cool it doesn't matter how little they are.
Well that's my opinion anyway.
EragonSaphira
well, the actual places themselves featured in architecture looks interesting. i'm pretty much a photoholic and jump at any chance of getting a good photo. i even take photos of the sky. anyway, this "fallingwater" place seems interesting. it reminds me a lot of the halo 2 multiplayer map called ivory tower or something...
...and going back onto the topic, i agree. i take pictures of small, usually insignificant things no one really seems to notice. taking photos of the sky might sound weird, but when it looks good, i don't really mind.
You two both have a point. I think taking photos of the sky can be good, if it's done right. Do you get good pictures of the stars?
ahh, unfortunately not.
i'm pretty sure it's because the stars don't have enough light to get clear shots. it's a real waste, especially when you're on a plane at night (when you're over the clouds, there are tons of stars).
Post a Comment
Thanks for leaving a comment, we will moderate it as soon as we can.