LEGO Architecture

| Jul 7, 2009
I know this doesn't have to do with MLN, however, we are attempting to branch off into ALL of LEGO.com, so you can be sure to keep up to date with the entire site here.

There is a new LEGO Product: Architecture. It will contain historically significant architectural buildings, such as the already included Seatle Space Needle and the Empire State Building. Here is the link, and thank you, RocketPenguin, for finding this information. You will get 15 clicks for your efforts.

8 comments:

Anonymous said... [REPLY]

bionicle.com has been updated with the legends.

EragonSaphira said... [REPLY]

This new Architectural LEGO looks really cool. My favorite one is the Seatle Space Needle. They should make a Disney World model, of Cinderella's Castle. That would be awesome.
EragonSaphira

Vanderdecken12 said... [REPLY]

Agreed! They actually have for purchase at Disneyland a set of "LEGO" models of Disneyland structures, but they're small and they're not actually LEGO.

EragonSaphira said... [REPLY]

That's awesome. A shame that they aren't LEGO though. I've never been to Disneyland or Disney World.
On the size; the Architecture, models are fairly small themselves, so small Disneyland castles wouldn't be that bad. As my English teacher tells me almost daily, "It's quality not quantity". So as long as they look cool it doesn't matter how little they are.
Well that's my opinion anyway.
EragonSaphira

Anonymous said... [REPLY]

well, the actual places themselves featured in architecture looks interesting. i'm pretty much a photoholic and jump at any chance of getting a good photo. i even take photos of the sky. anyway, this "fallingwater" place seems interesting. it reminds me a lot of the halo 2 multiplayer map called ivory tower or something...

Anonymous said... [REPLY]

...and going back onto the topic, i agree. i take pictures of small, usually insignificant things no one really seems to notice. taking photos of the sky might sound weird, but when it looks good, i don't really mind.

Vanderdecken12 said... [REPLY]

You two both have a point. I think taking photos of the sky can be good, if it's done right. Do you get good pictures of the stars?

Anonymous said... [REPLY]

ahh, unfortunately not.
i'm pretty sure it's because the stars don't have enough light to get clear shots. it's a real waste, especially when you're on a plane at night (when you're over the clouds, there are tons of stars).

Post a Comment

Thanks for leaving a comment, we will moderate it as soon as we can.

 

Top Comment Authors

Other Great Websites

MLN Blog Points

Followers